Johnson v. State

179 S.W.3d 904, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1933, 2005 WL 3527650
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Johnson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1107
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 27, 2005·No. ED 85905·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Terrell A. Johnson, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits without an evidentiary hearing his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s judgment is based on findings of facts and conclusions of law that are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We *905 affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. State, 179 S.W.3d 904, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1933, 2005 WL 3527650 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

179 S.W.3d 904 (Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.