Johnson v. State
136 S.W.3d 846, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 906, 2004 WL 1381110
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Johnson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 469 →
Opinion
ORDER
Jerrold Johnson appeals the judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief.1 He alleged his guilty plea lacked a factual basis.
Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Johnson v. State, 136 S.W.3d 846, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 906, 2004 WL 1381110 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004).
136 S.W.3d 846 (Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.