Johnson v. State
282 S.W.3d 891, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 673, 2009 WL 1372100
Opinion
ORDER
Steven Johnson appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, Johnson claims that the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion without an evidentiary hearing because Johnson alleged facts which, if true, would warrant relief; the allegations are not refuted by the record; and he was prejudiced by his trial counsel’s errors. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Johnson v. State, 282 S.W.3d 891, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 673, 2009 WL 1372100 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).
282 S.W.3d 891 (Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ellis v. State
282 S.W.3d 891 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)