Johnson v. State

298 S.W.3d 595, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1865, 2009 WL 4640384
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 8, 2009·No. ED 92289·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

William Johnson appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his Rule 24.035 motion 1 for postconviction relief, without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the findings, conclusions, and judgment of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Thomas v. State, 249 S.W.3d 234, 237 (Mo.App. E.D.2008). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2007, unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. State, 298 S.W.3d 595, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1865, 2009 WL 4640384 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

298 S.W.3d 595 (Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. DERECSKEY
298 S.W.3d 595 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)