Johnson v. State
334 S.W.3d 929, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 432, 2011 WL 1120203
Opinion
Movant Randy K. Johnson appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We find no error and affirm the motion court’s judgment.
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Johnson v. State, 334 S.W.3d 929, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 432, 2011 WL 1120203 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).
334 S.W.3d 929 (Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hamlin v. State
334 S.W.3d 929 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)