Johnson v. State

366 S.W.3d 667, 2012 WL 1926416, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 726
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Johnson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1083
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 29, 2012·No. ED 96665·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mario Johnson appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 29.15 motion. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2011).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. State, 366 S.W.3d 667, 2012 WL 1926416, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 726 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

366 S.W.3d 667 (Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.