Johnson v. State

307 S.W.3d 715, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 455, 2010 WL 1460067
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 13, 2010·No. ED 93297·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Gregory Johnson appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Johnson argues he was denied his right to effective assistance of trial counsel. We find the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. State, 307 S.W.3d 715, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 455, 2010 WL 1460067 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

307 S.W.3d 715 (Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moorehead v. State
307 S.W.3d 715 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)