Johnson v. State

323 S.W.3d 91, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1390, 2010 WL 4075729
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 19, 2010·No. No. ED 94212·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lonnell L. Johnson appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.151 motion. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. State, 323 S.W.3d 91, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1390, 2010 WL 4075729 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

323 S.W.3d 91 (Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Murphy v. State
323 S.W.3d 91 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)