Johnson v. State

385 S.W.3d 470, 2012 WL 3026580, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 922
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Johnson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1083
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 26, 2012·No. No. WD 74505·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Keith Johnson filed a petition for declaratory judgment seeking a declaration of the court that he was improperly found to be a persistent offender in Case No. 22021-1332 in the Circuit Court for the City of St. Louis. He appeals the summary judgment ruling that he had received the remedy he sought when the sentencing court entered a nunc pro tunc order correcting the finding that he was a persistent offender and, therefore, his petition was moot as a matter of law. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. State, 385 S.W.3d 470, 2012 WL 3026580, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 922 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

385 S.W.3d 470 (Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.