Jean Carolyn Youngblood v. Board of Public Instruction of Bay County, Florida

448 F.2d 770, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 8075
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 14, 1971
Docket71-2263
StatusPublished
Cited by46 cases

This text of 448 F.2d 770 (Jean Carolyn Youngblood v. Board of Public Instruction of Bay County, Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jean Carolyn Youngblood v. Board of Public Instruction of Bay County, Florida, 448 F.2d 770, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 8075 (5th Cir. 1971).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The District Court, sua sponte, dismissed this school integration case after making a finding that the school system was desegregated and unitary in nature. Plaintiffs-appellants urge on this appeal that the cause should not have been dismissed, but rather should be maintained on the inactive docket, for the next three school years, during which time the school district would be required to file status reports on the state of desegregation in the school system. Appellants further ask that the District Court be directed to dismiss the suit at the termination of the three year period only after notice and hearing at which appellants would be permitted an opportunity to show why dismissal of the cause should be further delayed.

It is ordered by the Court:

1. The order of the District Court dismissing this action is vacated, and the cause is remanded to the District Court with directions to reinstate the action, and to retain jurisdiction over the action for a period not less than three school .years. During the next three school years the school district shall be required by the court below to file semi-annual reports with the District Court similar to those required in United States v. Hinds County School Board, 5 Cir., 1970, 433 F.2d 611, 618-619.

2. At the conclusion of three school years the District Court should again consider whether the cause should be dismissed. In no event, however, shall the District Court dismiss the action without notice to the plaintiffs below and a hearing providing opportunity to plaintiffs-appellants to show cause why dismissal of the cause should be further delayed. See Wright v. Board of Public Instruction of Alachua County, Florida, 5 Cir., 1971, 445 F.2d 1397.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

M. Moore v. Tangipahoa Parish School Board
921 F.3d 545 (Fifth Circuit, 2019)
Thomas v. St. Martin Parish School Board
879 F. Supp. 2d 535 (W.D. Louisiana, 2012)
Tasby v. Moses
265 F. Supp. 2d 757 (N.D. Texas, 2003)
United States v. State of Georgia
171 F.3d 1344 (Eleventh Circuit, 1999)
Lee v. Etowah County Board of Education
963 F.2d 1416 (Eleventh Circuit, 1992)
Pitts ex rel. Pitts v. Freeman
887 F.2d 1438 (Eleventh Circuit, 1989)
Dowell v. Oklahoma City Public Schools
890 F.2d 1483 (Tenth Circuit, 1989)
United States v. Georgia
702 F. Supp. 1577 (M.D. Georgia, 1989)
United States v. State of Ga.
702 F. Supp. 1577 (M.D. Georgia, 1989)
Lee v. MacOn County Board of Education
681 F. Supp. 730 (N.D. Alabama, 1988)
United States v. Texas Education Agency
671 F. Supp. 484 (W.D. Texas, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
448 F.2d 770, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 8075, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jean-carolyn-youngblood-v-board-of-public-instruction-of-bay-county-ca5-1971.