United States v. Hinds County School Board

433 F.2d 602, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 7838
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedAugust 5, 1970
DocketNos. 28030, 28042
StatusPublished

This text of 433 F.2d 602 (United States v. Hinds County School Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Hinds County School Board, 433 F.2d 602, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 7838 (5th Cir. 1970).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The findings of fact and recommendations (appended hereto), entered on July 17, 1970 by Honorable Dan M. Russell, Jr., United States District Judge, in the within matter with respect to modifying the student assignment plan now in effect in the Quitman Consolidated School District are approved and made the order of this court subject to the following condition. Assignments to the reading clinic to be established at the Shirley-Owens Elementary school shall be on objective and non-racial standards. See Wright v. Board of Public Instruction of Alachua County, Florida, 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 1200.

It is so ordered.

APPENDIX FINDINGS OF FACT AND recommendations

On November 7, 1969, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in consolidated [603]*603Causes Nos. 28030 and 28042 directed the immediate enforcement of permanent student and faculty assignment plans prepared by the Office of Education, Department of Health, Education and Welfare in approximately 30 school systems in the Southern District of Mississippi in order to effectuate the conversion of these school systems to unitary systems. This Order likewise provided a procedure by which a school board may seek a modification of ’ said plan through an evidentiary proceeding before this Court. On May 11, 1970, and in conformance with said procedure, the board of trustees of the Quit-man Consolidated School District, involved in Cause No. 1302(E) on the docket of this Court filed á petition to modify the HEW plan with respect to the grades assigned to the Shirley-Owens Elementary School.

Clarke County, Mississippi, is divided into two school districts, the Enterprise Consolidated School District and the Quitman Consolidated School District, the latter only being involved herein. Prior to the HEW plan, the Quitman school district included seven schools with grade assignments and attendance as follows:

School Capacity Perm.W. Ports. Grades W Students N T
Zack Huggins Hi 700 9-12 494 2 496
Shirley-Owens Hi 700 820 7-12 0 646 646
Shirley-Owens Jr Hi 570 660 1-6 0 530 530
Quitman Upper Elementary 570 5-8 538 25 563
Quitman Lower Elementary 54,0 1-4 468 31 499
Shubuta Elem. 270 1-6 0 256 256
Stonewall Eiem. 210 1-6 156 0 156
Totals 3560 1656 1490 3146

The first five listed schools are located in and around the City of Quitman, the Shubuta and Stonewall schools being in the environs. The HEW plan directed the closing of both Shubuta and Stonewall as sub-standard schools, assigning these students to the schools in Quitman, and projected the district assignment as follows:

Capacity Students School Perm. W. Ports. Grades W N T
10-12 333 302 635 Zack Huggins Hi 700 700
7-9 453 355 808 Shirley-Owens Hi 700 820
Shirley-Owens Elem. 570 660 5-6 293 259 552
Quitman Upper Elem. 570 570 3-4 290 278 568
Quitman Lower Elem. 540 570 1-2 287 583 296
3080 3320 1656 1490 3146

After notice to all parties, a hearing was had on the board’s petition on June 28, 1970, at which plaintiffs, the school board, and the United States of America, as amicus curiae, were represented by counsel.

The school board’s petition, as orally amended at the hearing, seeks to eliminate the assignment of the sixth grade to Shirley-Owens Elementary School, by assigning this grade to Shirley-Owens High School, now serving grades 7-9; by assigning the 5th grade and only six sections of the 3rd grade to the Quitman Upper Elementary School now serving grades 3-4; and by adding two sections of grade 3 to the Quitman Lower Elementary School, now serving grades 1-2. The board proposes to use the Shirley-Owens Elementary School as a reading clinic for all students in grades 1-6 who are in need of specialized remedial reading. The school board contends that the proposed modifications are not racially motivated, but are sought to alleviate the impractical and unfeasible assignment of the 5th and 6th grade students to a school totally unsuitable to serve these grades. The entire proposal, showing changes in the names of some schools, is as follows:

1. Quitman Consolidated District High School, formerly Zack Huggins High School, to house all students in grades 10-12.

2. Quitman Consolidated District Junior High School, formerly the Shirley-Owens High School, to house all students in grades 6-9.

3. Quitman Upper Elementary School to house all students in grades 4-5 and six sections of grade 3.

[604]*6044. Quitman Lower Elementary School to house all students in grades 1-2 and two sections of grade 8.

5. Quitman Consolidated School District Reading Clinic, formerly known as Shirley-Owens Elementary School, to house all students in grades 1-6 who are in need of specialized remedial reading.

The board’s oral amendment of assigning part of the third grade to Quit-man Upper Elementary and part to the Quitman Lower Elementary instead of the fifth grade, as proposed in the petition, eliminates one of plaintiff’s objections to the board’s proposal — that is, the assignment of a part of the 5th grade to a school housing grades 1-2. Plaintiff’s other objections include: (1) the use of Shirley-Owens Elementary School as a special reading clinic would under-utilize that facility and will assure that the overwhelming majority of these students will be negro; (2) if Shirley-Owens Elementary School is closed, then the four remaining schools will be over-taxed;., and (3) defendants propose to close Shirley-Owens Elementary primarily because it was formerly a negro school.

The school board offered one witness, T. E. Cotten, the district superintendent, in support of its proposal. Plaintiff offered no evidence, relying on cross-examination of Mr. Cotten.

With reference to the Shirley-Owens Elementary School, the building information reflected in the HEW plan shows 16 teaching stations with a permanent capacity for 570 students and, with portables, a maximum capacity for 660 students. The assignment of grades 5-6 contemplated an enrollment of 552 students, which would be within the stated capacity. However, Mr. Cotten denied the accuracy of the building information. He stated that this building actually has 14 teaching stations with a student capacity of 420, and, with the one portable classroom in location, a maximum capacity for 450 students, or a shortage of space for over 100 students under the HEW assignment. Only 361 students, all black, currently attend. Although this fact in itself may indicate racial significance, and aside from the conflict in evidence as to whether or not the building is adequate to house the HEW assignment of 552 students, Cotten testified, uncontradictedly, to areas, other than housing, wherein this facility is neither suitable nor adequate for the 5th and 6th grades. The facility is located oh a 5% acre site, part of which, as reflected by photographs on file herein,.consists of. an eroded hill side, unimproved and undersized as a playground.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
433 F.2d 602, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 7838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hinds-county-school-board-ca5-1970.