James Messer, Jr. v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Respondent
This text of 808 F.2d 757 (James Messer, Jr. v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Respondent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ON SUA SPONTE RECONSIDERATION
A majority of the judges in active service have voted in favor of rehearing en banc the application for certificate of probable cause and motion for stay of execution. The order dated September 5, 1986, 801 F.2d 404, denying rehearing and rehearing en banc previously entered has been VACATED by a prior order.
IT IS ORDERED that this case shall be heard by this court sitting en banc, with oral argument, on a date hereafter to be fixed. In addition to briefing the issues on the application for certificate of probable cause, the parties are requested to address the merits of the issues which would be presented if a certificate of probable cause were issued, and the jurisdiction of the court to hear this matter en banc. The clerk will specify a schedule for filing en banc briefs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
808 F.2d 757, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 1305, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-messer-jr-v-ralph-kemp-warden-georgia-diagnostic-and-ca11-1987.