James Messer, Jr. v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Respondent

808 F.2d 757, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 1305
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided January 5, 1987·No. 86-8506·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

ON SUA SPONTE RECONSIDERATION

BY THE COURT:

A majority of the judges in active service have voted in favor of rehearing en banc the application for certificate of probable cause and motion for stay of execution. The order dated September 5, 1986, 801 F.2d 404, denying rehearing and rehearing en banc previously entered has been VACATED by a prior order.

IT IS ORDERED that this case shall be heard by this court sitting en banc, with oral argument, on a date hereafter to be fixed. In addition to briefing the issues on the application for certificate of probable cause, the parties are requested to address the merits of the issues which would be presented if a certificate of probable cause were issued, and the jurisdiction of the court to hear this matter en banc. The clerk will specify a schedule for filing en banc briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James Messer, Jr. v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Respondent, 808 F.2d 757, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 1305 (11th Cir. 1987).

808 F.2d 757 (James Messer, Jr. v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Respondent) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related