Irma Ovalles v. United States
This text of Irma Ovalles v. United States (Irma Ovalles v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 17-10172 Date Filed: 05/15/2018 Page: 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________
No. 17-10172 ________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:16-cv-02392-TWT
IRMA OVALLES,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent - Appellee.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia ________________________
Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, MARCUS, WILSON, WILLIAM PRYOR, MARTIN, JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, JILL PRYOR, NEWSOM, and BRANCH, Circuit Judges. *
* Judge Julie Carnes did not participate in the decision to rehear this case en banc and will not participate in the rehearing of it. Judge Frank Hull took senior status on December 31, 2017, and as a result did not participate in the decision to rehear this case en banc. As a member of the panel that originally issued a decision in this case, however, Judge Hull has elected to participate in the rehearing of it. See 28 U.S.C. § 46(c). Case: 17-10172 Date Filed: 05/15/2018 Page: 2 of 2
BY THE COURT:
A majority of judges in active service having decided to rehear this case en
banc, it is ORDERED that this case will be reheard en banc. The panel’s opinion
is VACATED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Irma Ovalles v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/irma-ovalles-v-united-states-ca11-2018.