FEDERAL · 18 U.S.C. · Chapter 110A
Interstate domestic violence
18 U.S.C. § 2261
Title18 — Crimes and Criminal Procedure
Chapter110A — DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND STALKING
This text of 18 U.S.C. § 2261 (Interstate domestic violence) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
18 U.S.C. § 2261.
Text
(a)Offenses.—
(1)Travel or conduct of offender.—A person who travels in interstate or foreign commerce or enters or leaves Indian country or is present within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States with the intent to kill, injure, harass, or intimidate a spouse, intimate partner, or dating partner, and who, in the course of or as a result of such travel or presence, commits or attempts to commit a crime of violence against that spouse, intimate partner, or dating partner, shall be punished as provided in subsection (b).
(2)Causing travel of victim.—A person who causes a spouse, intimate partner, or dating partner to travel in interstate or foreign commerce or to enter or leave Indian country by force, coercion, duress, or fraud, and who, in the course of,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Morrison
529 U.S. 598 (Supreme Court, 2000)
United States v. Aquilia Marcivicci Barnette, United States of America v. Aquilia Marcivicci Barnette
211 F.3d 803 (Fourth Circuit, 2000)
United States v. Lankford
196 F.3d 563 (Fifth Circuit, 1999)
United States v. Shrader
675 F.3d 300 (Fourth Circuit, 2012)
United States v. Hornsby
88 F.3d 336 (Fifth Circuit, 1996)
United States v. Charles Wesley Helem
186 F.3d 449 (Fourth Circuit, 1999)
United States v. Aquilia Marcivicci Barnette
390 F.3d 775 (Fourth Circuit, 2004)
Nicholson v. Williams
205 F.R.D. 92 (E.D. New York, 2001)
United States v. Shavanaux
647 F.3d 993 (Tenth Circuit, 2011)
United States v. Brown
295 F.3d 152 (First Circuit, 2002)
United States v. Douglas
646 F.3d 1134 (Eighth Circuit, 2011)
United States v. Larsen
615 F.3d 780 (Seventh Circuit, 2010)
Brzonkala v. Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University
169 F.3d 820 (Fourth Circuit, 1999)
United States v. Jay Scott Ballinger
395 F.3d 1218 (Eleventh Circuit, 2002)
United States v. McCall
699 F. App'x 452 (Sixth Circuit, 2017)
Bailey v. United States
(S.D. West Virginia, 2019)
Irma Ovalles v. United States
(Eleventh Circuit, 2018)
United States v. Bowe
(Fourth Circuit, 2001)
United States v. Merritt
(Fifth Circuit, 2022)
Sliwinski v. Rhodes
(D. Montana, 2025)
Source Credit
History
(Added Pub. L. 103–322, title IV, §40221(a), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1926; amended Pub. L. 104–201, div. A, title X, §1069(b)(1), (2), Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2656; Pub. L. 106–386, div. B, title I, §1107(a), Oct. 28, 2000, 114 Stat. 1497; Pub. L. 109–162, title I, §§114(b), 116(a), 117(a), Jan. 5, 2006, 119 Stat. 2988, 2989; Pub. L. 113–4, title I, §107(a), Mar. 7, 2013, 127 Stat. 77.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2013—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 113–4 inserted "is present" after "Indian country or" and "or presence" after "as a result of such travel".
2006—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 109–162, §117(a), inserted "or within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States" after "Indian country".
Pub. L. 109–162, §116(a)(1), which directed substitution of ", intimate partner, or dating partner" for "or intimate partner", was executed by making the substitution in two places to reflect the probable intent of Congress.
Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 109–162, §116(a)(2), which directed substitution of ", intimate partner, or dating partner" for "or intimate partner", was executed by making the substitution in two places to reflect the probable intent of Congress.
Subsec. (b)(6). Pub. L. 109–162, §114(b), added par. (6).
2000—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 106–386 added subsec. (a) and struck out heading and text of former subsec. (a). Text read as follows:
"(1) Crossing a state line.—A person who travels across a State line or enters or leaves Indian country with the intent to injure, harass, or intimidate that person's spouse or intimate partner, and who, in the course of or as a result of such travel, intentionally commits a crime of violence and thereby causes bodily injury to such spouse or intimate partner, shall be punished as provided in subsection (b).
"(2) Causing the crossing of a state line.—A person who causes a spouse or intimate partner to cross a State line or to enter or leave Indian country by force, coercion, duress, or fraud and, in the course or as a result of that conduct, intentionally commits a crime of violence and thereby causes bodily injury to the person's spouse or intimate partner, shall be punished as provided in subsection (b)."
1996—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 104–201 inserted "or section 2261A" after "this section" in introductory provisions and substituted "victim" for "offender's spouse or intimate partner" in pars. (1) to (3).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2013 Amendment
Pub. L. 113–4, §4, Mar. 7, 2013, 127 Stat. 64, provided that: "Except as otherwise specifically provided in this Act [see Tables for classification], the provisions of titles I, II, III, IV, VII, and sections 3, 602, 901, and 902 of this Act shall not take effect until the beginning of the fiscal year following the date of enactment of this Act [Mar. 7, 2013]."
Amendments
2013—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 113–4 inserted "is present" after "Indian country or" and "or presence" after "as a result of such travel".
2006—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 109–162, §117(a), inserted "or within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States" after "Indian country".
Pub. L. 109–162, §116(a)(1), which directed substitution of ", intimate partner, or dating partner" for "or intimate partner", was executed by making the substitution in two places to reflect the probable intent of Congress.
Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 109–162, §116(a)(2), which directed substitution of ", intimate partner, or dating partner" for "or intimate partner", was executed by making the substitution in two places to reflect the probable intent of Congress.
Subsec. (b)(6). Pub. L. 109–162, §114(b), added par. (6).
2000—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 106–386 added subsec. (a) and struck out heading and text of former subsec. (a). Text read as follows:
"(1) Crossing a state line.—A person who travels across a State line or enters or leaves Indian country with the intent to injure, harass, or intimidate that person's spouse or intimate partner, and who, in the course of or as a result of such travel, intentionally commits a crime of violence and thereby causes bodily injury to such spouse or intimate partner, shall be punished as provided in subsection (b).
"(2) Causing the crossing of a state line.—A person who causes a spouse or intimate partner to cross a State line or to enter or leave Indian country by force, coercion, duress, or fraud and, in the course or as a result of that conduct, intentionally commits a crime of violence and thereby causes bodily injury to the person's spouse or intimate partner, shall be punished as provided in subsection (b)."
1996—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 104–201 inserted "or section 2261A" after "this section" in introductory provisions and substituted "victim" for "offender's spouse or intimate partner" in pars. (1) to (3).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2013 Amendment
Pub. L. 113–4, §4, Mar. 7, 2013, 127 Stat. 64, provided that: "Except as otherwise specifically provided in this Act [see Tables for classification], the provisions of titles I, II, III, IV, VII, and sections 3, 602, 901, and 902 of this Act shall not take effect until the beginning of the fiscal year following the date of enactment of this Act [Mar. 7, 2013]."
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
18 U.S.C. § 2261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/18/2261.