Iosilevich v. Walmart Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided November 18, 2022·No. 7:22-cv-04757·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT PR UVEII □ SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CEO A □□ □ sens cece neem ne nen newman wen ernntonee rene neenX, a □□□ | ILYA FELIKSOVICH IOSILEVICH, near W718 Joo2 Plaintiff, : ORDER v. : 22 CV 4757 (VB) WALMART, INC., et al., : Defendants. : ween eee ee ee eee cee enn ren cen een een K On June 7, 2022, Plaintiff, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, commenced this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging violations of his constitutional rights. (Doc. #2.) On July 6, 2022, the Court entered an amended Order of Service which directed the New York State Police to assist plaintiff in identifying the John and Jane Doe troopers who assisted in his arrest. (Doc. #7). By letter dated September 2, 2022, the Office of the New York Attorney General (“NYAG”) identified the John Doe defendant as State Trooper Sean Mallinson and the Jane Doe defendant as State Trooper Courtney Ramos. (Doc. #10). On October 12, 2022, defendant Westchester County filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. (Doc. #12). On October 20, 2022, the Court ordered counsel for defendant Walmart, Inc., to identify the two Jane Doe Walmart employees and provide such information to the plaintiff and the Court by November 21, 2022. The Court further ordered plaintiff to file an amended complaint naming the two Jane Doe defendants, as well as defendants Mallinson and Ramos, within 30 days of receiving this information from Walmart’s counsel. (Doc. #18).

By letter dated November 17, 2022, Walmart’s counsel has now identified defendant “Jane Doe” as Genna Fraulo and defendant “Jane Doe a/k/a Biatriz” as Beatriz Leon Sharma. (Doc. #23). Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED:

1, By December 19, 2022, plaintiff shall file an amended complaint. Plaintiff shall use the amended complaint form attached to this Order. 2. The amended complaint must contain the full names of the John and Jane Doe defendants identified by the NYAG and the Jane Doe defendants identified by Walmart’s counsel, The amended complaint shall include all factual allegations regarding all named defendants. The amended complaint shall also address any deficiencies made apparent by the fully briefed arguments in Westchester County’s motion to dismiss. 3, The amended complaint will completely replace, not merely supplement, the existing complaint. Therefore, plaintiff must include in the amended complaint all information necessary for his claims against all defendants. 4, Once plaintiff has filed the amended complaint, the Court will screen the amended complaint and, if appropriate, issue an order directing the Clerk to issue summonses, complete the USM-285 forms with the service addresses of the newly-named defendants, and deliver to the U.S. Marshals Service all documents necessary to effect service. 5. Westchester County’s motion to dismiss (Doc. #12) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, pending the filing of the amended complaint. 6. All defendants’ deadlines to respond to the complaint are stayed pending further Court order. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this

Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purposes of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Chambers will mail a copy of this Order to the plaintiff at the address on the docket. Dated: November 18, 2022 White Plains, NY sO ul Vac Vincent L. Briccetti United States District Judge

en ee

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

_ CV nn nm (Includ ber if has been Write the full name of each plaintiff. tened) number mone naswee

-against- AMENDED

□□ COMPLAINT Do you want a jury trial? OYes ONo

Write the full name of each defendant. If you need more space, please write “see attached” in the space above and attach an additional sheet of paper with the full list of names. The names listed above must be identical to those contained in Section Il.

NOTICE The public can access electronic court files. For privacy and security reasons, papers filed with the court should therefore not contain: an individual’s full social security number or full birth date; the full name of a person known to be a minor; or a complete financial account number. A filing may include only: the last four digits of a social security number; the year of an individual’s birth; a minor’s initials; and the last four digits of a financial account number. See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2.

Rev, 2/10/17

I. BASIS FOR JURISDICTION Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction (limited power). Generally, only two types of cases can be heard in federal court: cases involving a federal question and cases involving diversity of citizenship of the parties. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1331, a case arising under the United States Constitution or federal laws or treaties is a federal question case. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, a case in which a citizen of one State sues a citizen of another State or nation, and the amount in controversy is more than $75,000, is a diversity case. In a diversity case, no defendant may be a citizen of the same State as any plaintiff. What is the basis for federal-court jurisdiction in your case? (J) Federal Question CO) Diversity of Citizenship A. If you checked Federal Question Which of your federal constitutional or federal statutory rights have been violated?

B. If you checked Diversity of Citizenship 1. Citizenship of the parties Of what State is each party a citizen? The plaintiff , , is a citizen of the State of (Plaintiff's name)

(State in which the person resides and intends to remain.) or, if not lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States, a citizen or subject of the foreign state of

If more than one plaintiff is named in the complaint, attach additional pages providing information for each additional plaintiff.

Page 2

If the defendant is an individual: The defendant, , is a citizen of the State of (Defendant’s name)

or, if not lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States, a citizen or subject of the foreign state of

If the defendant is a corporation: The defendant, , is incorporated under the laws of the State of and has its principal place of business in the State of or is incorporated under the laws of (foreign state) and has its principal place of business in if more than one defendant is named in the complaint, attach additional pages providing information for each additional defendant.

II, PARTIES A. Plaintiff Information Provide the following information for each plaintiff named in the complaint. Attach additional pages if needed.

NN First Name Middle Initial Last Name

a Street Address a County, City State Zip Code

Telephone Number Email Address (if available)

Page 3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Iosilevich v. Walmart Inc., (S.D.N.Y. 2022).

Iosilevich v. Walmart Inc. (Iosilevich v. Walmart Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)