Iosilevich v. Walmart Inc.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK wn ILYA FELIKSOVICH IOSILEVICH, Plaintiff, 22 CIVIL 4757 (VB) -against- JUDGMENT WALMART INC., JOSEPH NEGRON, KEVIN P. BRUEN, JOHN T. REICHERTER, and WESTCHESTER COUNTY GOVERNMENT, Defendants. wn eK
It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons set forth in the Court’s Opinion and Order dated January 12, 2024, motions to dismiss pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) are GRANTED and the motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(5) is DENIED. Plaintiff's request for leave to amend is DENIED. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York January 16, 2024
RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court
Deputy Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Iosilevich v. Walmart Inc. (Iosilevich v. Walmart Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.