Indemnity Insurance Company of North America, a Corporation v. United States to Use and Benefit of Bailey-Lewis-Williams of Florida, Inc.
This text of 299 F.2d 930 (Indemnity Insurance Company of North America, a Corporation v. United States to Use and Benefit of Bailey-Lewis-Williams of Florida, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from an order of the District Court denying the defendant-appellant’s motion to dismiss a suit brought against th'e surety on a contractor’s bond furnished under the Miller Act, 49 Stat. 793, 794 (1935), 40 U.S.C. §§ 270a, 270b (1958). We allowed an interlocutory appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) (1958). On the basis of the well-reasoned opinion of District Judge Matthews, 195 F.Supp. 752 (1961), the order will be affirmed. We add only that venue was properly laid in the District of Columbia, as the surety company was licensed to do business — and does business — here, see 28 U.S.C. § 1391 (1958), and as no other judicial district in the United States was suggested as an alternative forum. Cf. United States for Use and Benefit of Bryant Electric Co., Ltd. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 297 F.2d 665 (2d Cir. 1962).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
299 F.2d 930, 112 U.S. App. D.C. 99, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 5886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/indemnity-insurance-company-of-north-america-a-corporation-v-united-cadc-1962.