In re Johnson
815 F.3d 733, 2016 WL 919483, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 4469
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided March 10, 2016·No. No. 16-10011·Published·Cited by 8 cases
Opinion
A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard en banc, and a majority of the judges of this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting rehearing en banc,
It is ORDERED that this case will be reheard en banc. The panel’s February 26, 2016 and January 20, 2016 orders are VACATED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Johnson, 815 F.3d 733, 2016 WL 919483, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 4469 (11th Cir. 2016).
815 F.3d 733 (In re Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Danny Hill
81 F.4th 560 (Sixth Circuit, 2023)
United States v. Michael St. Hubert
918 F.3d 1174 (Eleventh Circuit, 2019)
In re: Octavious Williams
898 F.3d 1098 (Eleventh Circuit, 2018)
Bostock v. Clayton Cnty. Bd. of Comm'rs
894 F.3d 1335 (Eleventh Circuit, 2018)
In re Jones
830 F.3d 1295 (Eleventh Circuit, 2016)
In Re: Wayne Anderson
829 F.3d 1290 (Eleventh Circuit, 2016)
In re Leonard
655 F. App'x 765 (Eleventh Circuit, 2016)