In re Dollinger

474 F.2d 1027, 177 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 201, 1973 CCPA LEXIS 407
CourtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals
DecidedMarch 15, 1973
DocketPatent Appeal No. 8761
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 474 F.2d 1027 (In re Dollinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Customs and Patent Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Dollinger, 474 F.2d 1027, 177 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 201, 1973 CCPA LEXIS 407 (ccpa 1973).

Opinion

LANE, Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals, adhered to on reconsideration, sustaining the rejection of claims 29, 30, 31, 38, 39 and 41-44 (hereafter referred to as the rejected claims) and dismissing the appeal as to claims 33-37 and 40 (hereafter referred to as the dismissed claims) of appellants’ application1 entitled “Method and Apparatus for Producing Carbon Black.” All of the claims involved in this appeal [1028]*1028are process claims. We affirm the decision of the board.

The Subject Matter

Claim 29 is representative of the rejected claims and, with subparagraphing ours, is as follows:

In a process for producing high structure carbon black, the steps which comprise
injecting a hydrocarbon feed stream axially into a first generally cylindrical zone,
injecting a first gas stream containing air into said zone and passing it along the outer portion thereof in a direction concurrent with the flow of said feed,
passing the resulting streams successively through generally cylindrical second and third zones, the diameter of the second zone being substantially greater than that of the first and third zones,
introducing a second gas stream produced by burning fuel with air into the outer portion of said second zone, the volume of air in said first gas stream being at least 15 per cent of the combined volume of air in the first and second gas streams, adding sufficient heat with said gas streams to heat the feed to a carbon black forming temperature as it traverses said zones, and recovering carbon black from the gas stream leaving the third zone.

The other rejected claims depend from claim 29 and impose various limitations on the process defined therein.

Figure 1 of appellants’ specification illustrates the apparatus used:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Priest
582 F.2d 33 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1978)
In re Voss
557 F.2d 812 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1977)
In re Haas
486 F.2d 1053 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1973)
In re Schneider
481 F.2d 1350 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
474 F.2d 1027, 177 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 201, 1973 CCPA LEXIS 407, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-dollinger-ccpa-1973.