FEDERAL · 35 U.S.C. · Chapter 13
Appeal to Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
35 U.S.C. § 141
Title35 — Patents
Chapter13 — REVIEW OF PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE DECISIONS
This text of 35 U.S.C. § 141 (Appeal to Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
35 U.S.C. § 141.
Text
(a)Examinations.—An applicant who is dissatisfied with the final decision in an appeal to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board under section 134(a) may appeal the Board's decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. By filing such an appeal, the applicant waives his or her right to proceed under section 145.
(b)Reexaminations.—A patent owner who is dissatisfied with the final decision in an appeal of a reexamination to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board under section 134(b) may appeal the Board's decision only to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
(c)Post-Grant and Inter Partes Reviews.—A party to an inter partes review or a post-grant review who is dissatisfied with the final written decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board under sec
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Constant v. Advanced Micro-Devices, Inc.
848 F.2d 1560 (Federal Circuit, 1988)
In Re Bilski
545 F.3d 943 (Federal Circuit, 2008)
In Re Kubin
561 F.3d 1351 (Federal Circuit, 2009)
Credit Acceptance Corp. v. Westlake Services
859 F.3d 1044 (Federal Circuit, 2017)
Agilent Technologies, Inc. v. Affymetrix, Inc.
567 F.3d 1366 (Federal Circuit, 2009)
Investpic LLC v. International Business Machines Corp.
816 F.3d 1352 (Federal Circuit, 2016)
Straight Path Ip Group, Inc. v. Sipnet Eu S.R.O.
806 F.3d 1356 (Federal Circuit, 2015)
Eiselstein v. Frank
52 F.3d 1035 (Federal Circuit, 1995)
Frederick F. Glass v. William C. De Roo
239 F.2d 402 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1956)
In re Dien
680 F.2d 151 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1982)
Margolis v. Banner
599 F.2d 435 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1979)
United Sweetener USA, Inc. v. Nutrasweet Co.
766 F. Supp. 212 (D. Delaware, 1991)
Wi-Fi One, LLC v. Broadcom Corporation
837 F.3d 1329 (Federal Circuit, 2016)
In re Haas
486 F.2d 1053 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1973)
In Re Chapman
595 F.3d 1330 (Federal Circuit, 2010)
General Electric Company v. United Technologies Corp.
928 F.3d 1349 (Federal Circuit, 2019)
Regents of the University of Minnesota v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
61 F.4th 1350 (Federal Circuit, 2023)
Personal Audio, LLC v. CBS Corporation
946 F.3d 1348 (Federal Circuit, 2020)
Golden Gate Salami Company v. Gulf States Paper Corporation
332 F.2d 184 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1964)
Dionex Softron Gmbh v. Agilent Technologies, Inc.
56 F.4th 1353 (Federal Circuit, 2023)
Source Credit
History
(July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 802; Pub. L. 97–164, title I, §163(a)(7), (b)(2), Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 49, 50; Pub. L. 98–622, title II, §203(a), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3387; Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(9) [title IV, §§4605(c), 4732(a)(10)(A)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–571, 1501A–582; Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title III, §§13106(c), 13206(b)(1)(B), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1901, 1906; Pub. L. 112–29, §7(c)(1), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 314.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §59a (R.S. 4911, amended (1) Mar. 2, 1927, ch. 273, §8, 44 Stat. 1336, (2) Mar. 2, 1929, ch. 488, §2a, 45 Stat. 1476, (3) Aug. 5, 1939, ch. 451, §3, 53 Stat. 1212).
Changes in language are made.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2011—Pub. L. 112–29 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section related to appeals to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
2002—Pub. L. 107–273, §13206(b)(1)(B), made technical correction to directory language of Pub. L. 106–113, §1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4732(a)(10)(A)]. See 1999 Amendment note below.
Pub. L. 107–273, §13106(c), inserted ", or a third-party requester in an inter partes reexamination proceeding, who is" after "patent owner" in third sentence.
1999—Pub. L. 106–113, §1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4732(a)(10)(A)], as amended by Pub. L. 107–273, §13206(b)(1)(B), substituted "Director" for "Commissioner".
Pub. L. 106–113, §1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4605(c)], inserted after second sentence "A patent owner in any reexamination proceeding dissatisfied with the final decision in an appeal to the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences under section 134 may appeal the decision only to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit."
1984—Pub. L. 98–622, §203(a)(1)(A), substituted "in an appeal to the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences under section 134 of this title may appeal the decision" for "of the Board of Patent Appeals may appeal" in first sentence.
Pub. L. 98–622, §203(a)(1)(B), substituted ". By filing such an appeal the applicant waives his or her right" for ", thereby waiving his right" in first sentence.
Pub. L. 98–622, §203(a)(2)(A), substituted "Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences on the interference may appeal the decision" for "board of patent interferences on the question of priority of appeal" in second sentence.
Pub. L. 98–622, §203(a)(2)(B), substituted "In accordance with" for "according to" in second sentence.
Pub. L. 98–622, §203(a)(2)(C), substituted "the party" for "he" in second sentence.
Pub. L. 98–622, §203(a)(3), reenacted last sentence with minor changes in wording.
1982—Pub. L. 97–164, §163(b)(2), substituted "Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit" for "Court of Customs and Patent Appeals" in section catchline.
Pub. L. 97–164, §163(a)(7), substituted "Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit" for "Court of Customs and Patent Appeals" in two places.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2011 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 112–29 effective upon the expiration of the 1-year period beginning on Sept. 16, 2011, and applicable to proceedings commenced on or after that effective date, with certain exceptions, see section 7(e) of Pub. L. 112–29, set out as a note under section 6 of this title.
Effective Date of 2002 Amendment
Amendment by section 13106(c) of Pub. L. 107–273 applicable with respect to any reexamination proceeding commenced on or after Nov. 2, 2002, see section 13106(d) of Pub. L. 107–273, set out as a note under section 134 of this title.
Effective Date of 1999 Amendment
Amendment by section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4605(c)] of Pub. L. 106–113 applicable to any reexamination filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office on or after Nov. 2, 2002, see section 13202(d) of Pub. L. 107–273, set out as a note under section 134 of this title.
Amendment by section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4605(c)] of Pub. L. 106–113 effective Nov. 29, 1999, and applicable to any patent issuing from an original application filed in the United States on or after that date, see section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4608(a)] of Pub. L. 106–113, set out as a note under section 41 of this title.
Amendment by section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4732(a)(10)(A)] of Pub. L. 106–113 effective 4 months after Nov. 29, 1999, see section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4731] of Pub. L. 106–113, set out as a note under section 1 of this title.
Effective Date of 1984 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 98–622 effective three months after Nov. 8, 1984, see section 207 of Pub. L. 98–622, set out as a note under section 41 of this title.
Effective Date of 1982 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 97–164 effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section 402 of Pub. L. 97–164, set out as a note under section 171 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
Based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §59a (R.S. 4911, amended (1) Mar. 2, 1927, ch. 273, §8, 44 Stat. 1336, (2) Mar. 2, 1929, ch. 488, §2a, 45 Stat. 1476, (3) Aug. 5, 1939, ch. 451, §3, 53 Stat. 1212).
Changes in language are made.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2011—Pub. L. 112–29 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section related to appeals to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
2002—Pub. L. 107–273, §13206(b)(1)(B), made technical correction to directory language of Pub. L. 106–113, §1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4732(a)(10)(A)]. See 1999 Amendment note below.
Pub. L. 107–273, §13106(c), inserted ", or a third-party requester in an inter partes reexamination proceeding, who is" after "patent owner" in third sentence.
1999—Pub. L. 106–113, §1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4732(a)(10)(A)], as amended by Pub. L. 107–273, §13206(b)(1)(B), substituted "Director" for "Commissioner".
Pub. L. 106–113, §1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4605(c)], inserted after second sentence "A patent owner in any reexamination proceeding dissatisfied with the final decision in an appeal to the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences under section 134 may appeal the decision only to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit."
1984—Pub. L. 98–622, §203(a)(1)(A), substituted "in an appeal to the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences under section 134 of this title may appeal the decision" for "of the Board of Patent Appeals may appeal" in first sentence.
Pub. L. 98–622, §203(a)(1)(B), substituted ". By filing such an appeal the applicant waives his or her right" for ", thereby waiving his right" in first sentence.
Pub. L. 98–622, §203(a)(2)(A), substituted "Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences on the interference may appeal the decision" for "board of patent interferences on the question of priority of appeal" in second sentence.
Pub. L. 98–622, §203(a)(2)(B), substituted "In accordance with" for "according to" in second sentence.
Pub. L. 98–622, §203(a)(2)(C), substituted "the party" for "he" in second sentence.
Pub. L. 98–622, §203(a)(3), reenacted last sentence with minor changes in wording.
1982—Pub. L. 97–164, §163(b)(2), substituted "Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit" for "Court of Customs and Patent Appeals" in section catchline.
Pub. L. 97–164, §163(a)(7), substituted "Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit" for "Court of Customs and Patent Appeals" in two places.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2011 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 112–29 effective upon the expiration of the 1-year period beginning on Sept. 16, 2011, and applicable to proceedings commenced on or after that effective date, with certain exceptions, see section 7(e) of Pub. L. 112–29, set out as a note under section 6 of this title.
Effective Date of 2002 Amendment
Amendment by section 13106(c) of Pub. L. 107–273 applicable with respect to any reexamination proceeding commenced on or after Nov. 2, 2002, see section 13106(d) of Pub. L. 107–273, set out as a note under section 134 of this title.
Effective Date of 1999 Amendment
Amendment by section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4605(c)] of Pub. L. 106–113 applicable to any reexamination filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office on or after Nov. 2, 2002, see section 13202(d) of Pub. L. 107–273, set out as a note under section 134 of this title.
Amendment by section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4605(c)] of Pub. L. 106–113 effective Nov. 29, 1999, and applicable to any patent issuing from an original application filed in the United States on or after that date, see section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4608(a)] of Pub. L. 106–113, set out as a note under section 41 of this title.
Amendment by section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4732(a)(10)(A)] of Pub. L. 106–113 effective 4 months after Nov. 29, 1999, see section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4731] of Pub. L. 106–113, set out as a note under section 1 of this title.
Effective Date of 1984 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 98–622 effective three months after Nov. 8, 1984, see section 207 of Pub. L. 98–622, set out as a note under section 41 of this title.
Effective Date of 1982 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 97–164 effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section 402 of Pub. L. 97–164, set out as a note under section 171 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
35 U.S.C. § 141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/35/141.