FEDERAL · 35 U.S.C. · Chapter 12

Appeal to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board

35 U.S.C. § 134
Title35Patents
Chapter12 — EXAMINATION OF APPLICATION

This text of 35 U.S.C. § 134 (Appeal to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
35 U.S.C. § 134.

Text

(a)Patent Applicant.—An applicant for a patent, any of whose claims has been twice rejected, may appeal from the decision of the primary examiner to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, having once paid the fee for such appeal.
(b)Patent Owner.—A patent owner in a reexamination may appeal from the final rejection of any claim by the primary examiner to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, having once paid the fee for such appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Herbert Rosenthal Jewelry Corp. v. Edward and Lucy Kalpakian, Etc.
446 F.2d 738 (Ninth Circuit, 1971)
134 case citations
In Re Mouttet
686 F.3d 1322 (Federal Circuit, 2012)
104 case citations
In Re Kuriappan P. Alappat, Edward E. Averill and James G. Larsen
33 F.3d 1526 (Federal Circuit, 1994)
101 case citations
Star Fruits s.n.c. v. United States
393 F.3d 1277 (Federal Circuit, 2005)
71 case citations
Ropes & Gray LLP v. Jalbert (In Re Engage, Inc.)
544 F.3d 50 (First Circuit, 2008)
53 case citations
Vacheron & Constantin-Le Coultre Watches, Inc. v. Benrus Watch Company, Inc.
260 F.2d 637 (Second Circuit, 1958)
51 case citations
In Re Michael Ben Graves
69 F.3d 1147 (Federal Circuit, 1995)
44 case citations
Digital Equipment Corporation v. Sidney A. Diamond, Etc.
653 F.2d 701 (First Circuit, 1981)
35 case citations
Ropes & Gray LLP v. Jalbert
910 N.E.2d 330 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 2009)
28 case citations
Application of Leo L. Hengehold
440 F.2d 1395 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1971)
20 case citations
In Re John D. Webb, Jr., Roy Y. Hori, and George E. Simpson
916 F.2d 1553 (Federal Circuit, 1990)
19 case citations
United Sweetener USA, Inc. v. Nutrasweet Co.
766 F. Supp. 212 (D. Delaware, 1991)
15 case citations
In re Haas
486 F.2d 1053 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1973)
14 case citations
In Re Ole K. Nilssen
851 F.2d 1401 (Federal Circuit, 1988)
13 case citations
In re Voss
557 F.2d 812 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1977)
12 case citations
In Re Laughlin Products, Inc.
265 F. Supp. 2d 525 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2003)
8 case citations
Transmatic, Inc. v. Gulton Industries, Inc., and Patent License Corp.
601 F.2d 904 (Sixth Circuit, 1979)
7 case citations
In Re Richard C. Beaver
893 F.2d 329 (Federal Circuit, 1989)
7 case citations
Russell v. Trimfit, Inc.
428 F. Supp. 91 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1977)
7 case citations

Source Credit

History

(July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 801; Pub. L. 98–622, title II, §204(b)(1), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3388; Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4605(b)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–570; Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title III, §§13106(b), 13202(b)(1), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1901; Pub. L. 112–29, §§3(j)(1), (3), 7(b), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 290, 313.)

Editorial Notes

Historical and Revision Notes
Based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §57 (R.S. 4909 amended (1) Mar. 2, 1927, ch. 273, §5, 44 Stat. 1335, 1336, (2) Aug. 5, 1939, ch. 451, §2, 53 Stat. 1212).
Reference to reissues is omitted in view of the general provision in section 251. Minor changes in language are made.

Editorial Notes

Amendments
2011—Pub. L. 112–29, §3(j)(3), amended section catchline generally. Prior to amendment, section catchline read as follows: "Appeal to the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences".
Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 112–29, §3(j)(1), substituted "Patent Trial and Appeal Board" for "Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences".
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 112–29, §7(b)(1), substituted "a reexamination" for "any reexamination proceeding".
Pub. L. 112–29, §3(j)(1), substituted "Patent Trial and Appeal Board" for "Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences".
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 112–29, §7(b)(2), struck out subsec. (c). Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "A third-party requester in an inter partes proceeding may appeal to the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences from the final decision of the primary examiner favorable to the patentability of any original or proposed amended or new claim of a patent, having once paid the fee for such appeal."
2002—Subsecs. (a), (b). Pub. L. 107–273, §13202(b)(1), substituted "primary examiner" for "administrative patent judge".
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 107–273, §13202(b)(1), substituted "primary examiner" for "administrative patent judge".
Pub. L. 107–273, §13106(b), struck out at end "The third-party requester may not appeal the decision of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences."
1999—Pub. L. 106–113 reenacted section catchline without change and amended text generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "An applicant for a patent, any of whose claims has been twice rejected, may appeal from the decision of the primary examiner to the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, having once paid the fee for such appeal."
1984—Pub. L. 98–622 substituted "Patent Appeals and Interferences" for "Appeals" in section catchline and text.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 2011 Amendment
Amendment by section 3(j)(1), (3) of Pub. L. 112–29 effective upon the expiration of the 18-month period beginning on Sept. 16, 2011, and applicable to certain applications for patent and any patents issuing thereon, see section 3(n) of Pub. L. 112–29, set out as an Effective Date of 2011 Amendment; Savings Provisions note under section 100 of this title.
Amendment by section 7(b) of Pub. L. 112–29 effective upon the expiration of the 1-year period beginning on Sept. 16, 2011, and applicable to proceedings commenced on or after that effective date, with certain exceptions, see section 7(e) of Pub. L. 112–29, set out as a note under section 6 of this title.

Effective Date of 2002 Amendment
Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title III, §13106(d), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1901, provided that: "The amendments made by this section [amending this section and sections 141 and 315 of this title] apply with respect to any reexamination proceeding commenced on or after the date of enactment of this Act [Nov. 2, 2002]."

Effective Date of 1999 Amendment
Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title III, §13202(d), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1902, provided that: "The amendments made by section 4605(b), (c), and (e) of the Intellectual Property and Communications Omnibus Reform Act, as enacted by section 1000(a)(9) of Public Law 106–113 [amending this section and sections 141 and 145 of this title], shall apply to any reexamination filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office on or after the date of enactment of Public Law 106–113 [Nov. 29, 1999]."
Amendment by Pub. L. 106–113 effective Nov. 29, 1999, and applicable to any patent issuing from an original application filed in the United States on or after that date, see section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4608(a)] of Pub. L. 106–113, set out as a note under section 41 of this title.

Effective Date of 1984 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 98–622 effective three months after Nov. 8, 1984, see section 207 of Pub. L. 98–622, set out as a note under section 41 of this title.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 U.S.C. § 134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/35/134.