In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
12 A.D.3d 307, 786 N.Y.S.2d 914, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14624
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Read the opinion of the Court — 291 A.D.2d 631 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 23, 2004·Published
Opinion
Respondent reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective the date hereof. No opinion. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Saxe, Ellerin and Williams, JJ. [See 240 AD2d 106 (1998).]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 12 A.D.3d 307, 786 N.Y.S.2d 914, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14624 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).
12 A.D.3d 307 (In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
240 A.D.2d 106 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)