In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
Opinion
Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this
Court in 1987, was suspended by this Court’s order dated November 20, 1998 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a (255 AD2d 827).
Respondent has now complied with the registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and has paid the fees as required by the statute and rules of the Chief Administrative Judge. Petitioner does not object to respondent’s instant application for reinstatement.
[587]*587Respondent’s application is granted and he is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.
Cardona, P.J., Mercare, Crew III, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted, and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
296 A.D.2d 586 (In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.