In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
263 A.D.2d 442, 696 N.Y.S.2d 804, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8591
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Read the opinion of the Court — 230 A.D.2d 366 →
Opinion
—Motions granted and respondents reinstated as attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, effective the date hereof. No opinion. Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Nardelli, Williams, Mazzarelli and Saxe, JJ. [See, 230 AD2d 366, 247 AD2d 158.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 263 A.D.2d 442, 696 N.Y.S.2d 804, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8591 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).
263 A.D.2d 442 (In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
230 A.D.2d 366 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
247 A.D.2d 158 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)