Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a.

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a.

243 A.D.2d 430, 668 N.Y.S.2d 88
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a.. Read the opinion of the Court — 230 A.D.2d 366 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 30, 1997·Published

Opinion

Motion granted and respondent reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately. No opinion. Concur—Milonas, J. P., Ellerin, Nardelli, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ. [See, 230 AD2d 366.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a., 243 A.D.2d 430, 668 N.Y.S.2d 88 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

243 A.D.2d 430 (In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
230 A.D.2d 366 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)