In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
248 A.D.2d 133, 672 N.Y.S.2d 673
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Read the opinion of the Court — 230 A.D.2d 366 →
Opinion
—The order of this Court entered on April 24, 1997 (230 AD2d 366), is recalled and vacated nunc pro tunc, and the Opinion Per Curiam filed therewith is amended to vacate so much thereof as pertains to the above-named respondent. Respondent’s name is directed to be restored to the roll of [134]*134attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, nunc pro tunc. No opinion. Concur — Milonas, J. P., Ellerin, Nardelli, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 248 A.D.2d 133, 672 N.Y.S.2d 673 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).
248 A.D.2d 133 (In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
230 A.D.2d 366 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)