Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a

247 A.D.2d 351, 671 N.Y.S.2d 967, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2676
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Read the opinion of the Court — 230 A.D.2d 366 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 26, 1998·Published

Opinion

Motion granted insofar as to reinstate respondent as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately. No opinion.

Concur — Milonas, J. P., Ellerin, Nardelli, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.

[See, 230 AD2d 366.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 247 A.D.2d 351, 671 N.Y.S.2d 967, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2676 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

247 A.D.2d 351 (In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
230 A.D.2d 366 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)