In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
264 A.D.2d 627, 703 N.Y.S.2d 399, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9243
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Read the opinion of the Court — 230 A.D.2d 366 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 16, 1999·Published
Opinion
Motions granted and respondents reinstated as attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, effective the date hereof. No opinion. Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Nardelli, Williams, Mazzarelli and Saxe, JJ. [See, 230 AD2d 366; 240 AD2d 106.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 264 A.D.2d 627, 703 N.Y.S.2d 399, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9243 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).
264 A.D.2d 627 (In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
230 A.D.2d 366 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
In re of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
240 A.D.2d 106 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)