Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a

293 A.D.2d 264, 740 N.Y.S.2d 191, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5040
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Read the opinion of the Court — 258 A.D.2d 127 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 2, 2002·Published

Opinion

Respondent reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective the date hereof. No opinion. [See 247 AD2d 158.] Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Rosenberger, Ellerin and Marlow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 293 A.D.2d 264, 740 N.Y.S.2d 191, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5040 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

293 A.D.2d 264 (In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
247 A.D.2d 158 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)