In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
261 A.D.2d 162, 689 N.Y.S.2d 100, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5583
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Read the opinion of the Court — 230 A.D.2d 366 →
Opinion
—Motion granted and respondent reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective the date hereof. No opinion. Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Nardelli, Williams, Mazzarelli and Saxe, JJ. [See, 240 AD2d 106.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 261 A.D.2d 162, 689 N.Y.S.2d 100, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5583 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).
261 A.D.2d 162 (In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
240 A.D.2d 106 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)