In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
289 A.D.2d 54, 738 N.Y.S.2d 560, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12422
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Read the opinion of the Court — 258 A.D.2d 127 →
Opinion
Respondent reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective the date hereof.
No opinion. [See 257 AD2d 127.] Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Williams, Mazzarelli, Ellerin and Saxe, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 289 A.D.2d 54, 738 N.Y.S.2d 560, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12422 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).
289 A.D.2d 54 (In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
257 A.D.2d 127 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)