In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
256 A.D.2d 223, 683 N.Y.S.2d 833, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14089
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Read the opinion of the Court — 230 A.D.2d 366 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 22, 1998·Published
Opinion
—Motion granted and the above-named respondent reinstated as attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective the date hereof. No opinion. Concur — Milonas, J. P., Ellerin, Nardelli, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ. [See, 230 AD2d 366.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 256 A.D.2d 223, 683 N.Y.S.2d 833, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14089 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).
256 A.D.2d 223 (In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
230 A.D.2d 366 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)