In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a

258 A.D.2d 498, 683 N.Y.S.2d 836
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Read the opinion of the Court — 230 A.D.2d 366

Opinion

—Motion granted and respondent reinstated as [499]*499an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective the date hereof. No opinion. Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Nardelli, Williams, Mazzarelli and Saxe, JJ. [See, 240 AD2d 106.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 258 A.D.2d 498, 683 N.Y.S.2d 836 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

258 A.D.2d 498 (In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
240 A.D.2d 106 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)