In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a

291 A.D.2d 252, 741 N.Y.S.2d 403, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1723
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Read the opinion of the Court — 258 A.D.2d 127

Opinion

—Respondent reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective the date hereof. No opinion. Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Williams, Mazzarelli, Saxe and Ellerin, JJ. [See, 257 AD2d 127.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 291 A.D.2d 252, 741 N.Y.S.2d 403, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1723 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

291 A.D.2d 252 (In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
257 A.D.2d 127 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)