Howard v. Queen City Coach Co.
This text of 4 S.E.2d 616 (Howard v. Queen City Coach Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
One member of the Court, Winborne, J., not sitting, and thfe remaining six being evenly divided in opinion whether reversible error has been shown, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed, accordant with the usual practice in such cases, and stands as the decision in the instant case, without becoming a precedent. Toxey v. Meggs, ante, 198, and cases there cited.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 S.E.2d 616, 216 N.C. 799, 1939 N.C. LEXIS 81, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-v-queen-city-coach-co-nc-1939.