Gardner v. McDonald
223 N.C. 854
Opinion
One member of the Court, Schenck, J., not sitting, and the remaining six being evenly divided in opinion as to the correctness of the ruling of the court below, the judgment of the Superior Court stands affirmed as the disposition of this appeal, without becoming a precedent, accordant with the usual practice in such eases. Howard v. Coach Co., 216 N. C., 799, 4 S. E. (2d), 449; Elmore v. General Amusements, 221 N. C., 535, 19 S. E. (2d), 5.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gardner v. McDonald, 223 N.C. 854 (N.C. 1943).
223 N.C. 854 (Gardner v. McDonald) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Willis
209 S.E.2d 457 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1974)
Sharpe v. Pugh
209 S.E.2d 456 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1974)
James v. Rogers
58 S.E.2d 640 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1950)