State v. Vinson

58 S.E.2d 367, 231 N.C. 603, 1950 N.C. LEXIS 356
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMarch 22, 1950
StatusPublished

This text of 58 S.E.2d 367 (State v. Vinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Vinson, 58 S.E.2d 367, 231 N.C. 603, 1950 N.C. LEXIS 356 (N.C. 1950).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

One member of tbe Court, Justice Barnhill, not sitting, and tbe remaining members being evenly divided in opinion whether tbe judgment should be affirmed, or reversed on tbe motion to nonsuit, in accord with tbe practice of tbe Court tbe judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed as tbe disposition of tbe appeal without becoming a precedent. Howard v. Coach Co., 216 N.C. 799, 4 S.E. 2d 449.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Howard v. Queen City Coach Co.
4 S.E.2d 616 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1939)
Fibre Co. v. . Lee
4 S.E.2d 449 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
58 S.E.2d 367, 231 N.C. 603, 1950 N.C. LEXIS 356, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-vinson-nc-1950.