State v. Vinson

58 S.E.2d 367, 231 N.C. 603, 1950 N.C. LEXIS 356
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided March 22, 1950·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

One member of tbe Court, Justice Barnhill, not sitting, and tbe remaining members being evenly divided in opinion whether tbe judgment should be affirmed, or reversed on tbe motion to nonsuit, in accord with tbe practice of tbe Court tbe judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed as tbe disposition of tbe appeal without becoming a precedent. Howard v. Coach Co., 216 N.C. 799, 4 S.E. 2d 449.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Vinson, 58 S.E.2d 367, 231 N.C. 603, 1950 N.C. LEXIS 356 (N.C. 1950).

58 S.E.2d 367 (State v. Vinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Howard v. Queen City Coach Co.
4 S.E.2d 616 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1939)
Fibre Co. v. . Lee
4 S.E.2d 449 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1939)