Pinehurst Warehouses, Inc. v. A. Burker & Co.

25 S.E.2d 435, 223 N.C. 853
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided May 5, 1943·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The only material assignment of error in the record is directed to the refusal of the court below to dismiss as of nonsuit. The Court, Schenclc, J., not sitting, being evenly divided on the merits of this assignment of error, which involves the force and effect of the instructions given plaintiff, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed in accord with the usual practice in such cases, and stands as the decision in this case without becoming a precedent. Howard v. Coach Co., 216 N. C., 799, 4 S. E. (2d), 449; Pafford v. Construction Co., 218 N. C., 782, 11 S. E. (2d), 548; Smith v. Furniture Co., 221 N. C., 536, 19 S. E. (2d), 17.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pinehurst Warehouses, Inc. v. A. Burker & Co., 25 S.E.2d 435, 223 N.C. 853 (N.C. 1943).

25 S.E.2d 435 (Pinehurst Warehouses, Inc. v. A. Burker & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Howard v. Queen City Coach Co.
4 S.E.2d 616 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1939)
State v. . Finch
11 S.E.2d 548 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1940)
Smith v. McDowell Furniture Co.
19 S.E.2d 17 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1942)
Fibre Co. v. . Lee
4 S.E.2d 449 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1939)