Bullard v. Hotel Holding Co.

225 N.C. 766
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided March 28, 1945·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

One member of the Court, Barnhill, J., not sitting, and the remaining six being evenly divided in opinion as to whether on the [767]*767record on tbis appeal there is any sufficient evidence of negligence on the part of defendant as alleged by plaintiffs, the judgment of Superior Court is affirmed, according to usual practice of the Court in such cases, and stands as the decision in this case — without becoming a precedent. Howard v. Coach Co., 216 N. C., 799, 4 S. E. (2d), 449; Pafford v. Construction Co., 218 N. C., 782, 11 S. E. (2d), 548; Smith v. Furniture Co., 221 N. C., 536, 19 S. E. (2d), 17; Whichard v. Lipe, 223 N. C., 856, 25 S. E. (2d), 593.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bullard v. Hotel Holding Co., 225 N.C. 766 (N.C. 1945).

225 N.C. 766 (Bullard v. Hotel Holding Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Parrish v. PIEDMONT PUBLISHING COMPANY
157 S.E.2d 334 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1967)