Hill v. State
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of armed robbery by the Superior Court of Richmond County. After the appeal was filed in this court, appellant’s appointed counsel filed a request for permission to withdraw from the case.
In Bethay v. State, 237 Ga. 625 (229 SE2d 406) (1976), we held that appointed counsel may withdraw from a case *565 on appeal only upon compliance with the rules set out in Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738 (87 SC 1396, 18 LE2d 493) (1966). We find that all of the Anders requirements have been met.
As required by our decision in Bethay, we have fully examined the record and transcript to determine whether, in fact, the appeal is frivolous. We find that it is. See Miller v. State, 238 Ga. 560 (1977). Accordingly, counsel is granted permission to withdraw and the appeal is dismissed.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
233 S.E.2d 796 (Hill v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.