Gates v. State

284 S.E.2d 85, 159 Ga. App. 580, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 2704
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 15, 1981
Docket62252
StatusPublished

This text of 284 S.E.2d 85 (Gates v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gates v. State, 284 S.E.2d 85, 159 Ga. App. 580, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 2704 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981).

Opinion

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

Defendant was convicted of the offenses of criminal attempt to commit rape, aggravated assault, and criminal damage to property in the second degree. After the appeal was filed in this court defendant’s appointed counsel filed a request for permission to withdraw from the case pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738 (87 SC 1396, 18 LE2d 493), that is, that after a careful and conscientious examination of the record and proceedings counsel believes that an appeal from this case would be wholly frivolous. Counsel has fully complied with the requirements of Bethay v. State, 237 Ga. 625 (229 SE2d 406). See also, Hill v. State, 238 Ga. 564 (233 SE2d 796).

After examination of the record and transcript we find the appeal is wholly frivolous. Counsel has been granted permission to withdraw. The defendant has been notified of this action and of his options by reason thereof. No other counsel has been appointed or employed and defendant has not raised any enumeration of error or valid ground for appeal prior to the rendition of this opinion.

In compliance with the above cases, we have fully and carefully examined the record and transcript. We find no reversible error. A rational trier of fact (the jury in the case sub judice) could reasonably have found from the evidence adduced at the trial proof of guilt of the defendant beyond a reasonable doubt of the offenses of criminal attempt to commit rape, aggravated assault, and criminal damage to property in the second degree. See, Snell v. State, 246 Ga. 648 (272 SE2d 348); Baldwin v. State, 153 Ga. App. 35, 37 (264 SE2d 528). See also, Mason v. State, 157 Ga. App. 392 (278 SE2d 498).

Judgment affirmed.

Quillian, C. J., and Pope, J., concur. [581]*581Decided September 15, 1981. Arthur E. Mallory III, District Attorney, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Mason v. State
278 S.E.2d 498 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1981)
Baldwin v. State
264 S.E.2d 528 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)
Snell v. State
272 S.E.2d 348 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1980)
Hill v. State
233 S.E.2d 796 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1977)
Bethay v. State
229 S.E.2d 406 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
284 S.E.2d 85, 159 Ga. App. 580, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 2704, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gates-v-state-gactapp-1981.