Mason v. State
This text of 278 S.E.2d 498 (Mason v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant was convicted of armed robbery and forgery of a credit card and brings this appeal. Appellate counsel filed a motion to withdraw on the ground that the appeal was wholly frivolous. Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738 (87 SC 1396, 18 LE2d 493) (1966); Bethay v. State, 237 Ga. 625 (229 SE2d 406) (1976). All requirements of Anders having been met, after examination of the record and transcript we found the appeal to be wholly frivolous and granted permission of counsel to withdraw. Neither has the defendant raised any enumeration of error or valid ground for appeal. In further compliance with Anders, we have fully and carefully examined the record and transcript and find no reversible error.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
278 S.E.2d 498, 157 Ga. App. 392, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 1833, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mason-v-state-gactapp-1981.