Weaver v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Weaver v. State

288 S.E.2d 609, 160 Ga. App. 898, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 2992

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 12, 1982

Docket63042

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 288 S.E.2d 609 (Weaver v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weaver v. State, 288 S.E.2d 609, 160 Ga. App. 898, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 2992 (Ga. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

Defendant was convicted of the offenses of nine counts of burglary and one count of criminal attempt to commit burglary. After the appeal was filed in this court defendant’s appointed counsel filed permission to withdraw from the case pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738 (87 SC 1396, 18 LE2d 493), that is, that after a careful and conscientious examination of the record and proceedings counsel believes an appeal of this case to be wholly frivolous. Counsel has fully complied with the requirements of Bethay v. State, 237 Ga. 625 (229 SE2d 406). See also Hill v. State, 238 Ga. 564 (233 SE2d 796).

After examination of the record and transcript we find the appeal is wholly frivolous. Counsel has been granted permission to withdraw. The defendant has been notified of this action and of his options by reason thereof. No other counsel has been appointed or employed and defendant has not raised any enumeration of error or valid ground for appeal prior to the rendition of this opinion.

In compliance with the above cases, we have fully and carefully examined the record and transcript. We find no reversible error. A rational trier of fact (the jury in the case sub judice) could reasonably have found from the evidence adduced at the trial proof of guilt of the defendant beyond a reasonable doubt of the offenses of nine counts of burglary and one count of criminal attempt to commit burglary. See Snell v. State, 246 Ga. 648 (272 SE2d 348); Baldwin v. State, 153 Ga. App. 35, 37 (264 SE2d 528). See also Mason v. State, 157 Ga. App. 392 (278 SE2d 498).

Judgment affirmed.

Quillian, C. J., and Pope, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

Defendant was convicted of the offenses of nine counts of burglary and one count of criminal attempt to commit burglary. After the appeal was filed in this court defendant’s appointed counsel filed permission to withdraw from the case pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738 (87 SC 1396, 18 LE2d 493), that is, that after a careful and conscientious examination of the record and proceedings counsel believes an appeal of this case to be wholly frivolous. Counsel has fully complied with the requirements of Bethay v. State, 237 Ga. 625 (229 SE2d 406). See also Hill v. State, 238 Ga. 564 (233 SE2d 796).

After examination of the record and transcript we find the appeal is wholly frivolous. Counsel has been granted permission to withdraw. The defendant has been notified of this action and of his options by reason thereof. No other counsel has been appointed or employed and defendant has not raised any enumeration of error or valid ground for appeal prior to the rendition of this opinion.

In compliance with the above cases, we have fully and carefully examined the record and transcript. We find no reversible error. A rational trier of fact (the jury in the case sub judice) could reasonably have found from the evidence adduced at the trial proof of guilt of the defendant beyond a reasonable doubt of the offenses of nine counts of burglary and one count of criminal attempt to commit burglary. See Snell v. State, 246 Ga. 648 (272 SE2d 348); Baldwin v. State, 153 Ga. App. 35, 37 (264 SE2d 528). See also Mason v. State, 157 Ga. App. 392 (278 SE2d 498).

Judgment affirmed.

Quillian, C. J., and Pope, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

288 S.E.2d 609, 160 Ga. App. 898, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 2992, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weaver-v-state-gactapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack