Lewallen v. State

290 S.E.2d 104, 161 Ga. App. 652, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 3064
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 15, 1982
Docket63520
StatusPublished

This text of 290 S.E.2d 104 (Lewallen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lewallen v. State, 290 S.E.2d 104, 161 Ga. App. 652, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 3064 (Ga. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

The defendant was convicted of seven counts of forgery in the second degree, with reference to certain doctor’s prescriptions and brings this appeal.

After the appeal was filed in this court defendant’s appointed counsel filed a request for permission to withdraw from the case pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738 (87 SC 1396, 18 LE2d 493), that is, that after a careful and conscientious examination of the record and proceedings counsel believes that an appeal of this case would be wholly frivolous. Counsel has fully complied with the requirements of Bethay v. State, 237 Ga. 625 (229 SE2d 406). See also Hill v. State, 238 Ga. 564 (233 SE2d 796).

After examination of the record and transcript we find the appeal is wholly frivolous. Counsel has been granted permission to withdraw. The defendant has been notified and of his options by [653]*653reason thereof. No other counsel has been appointed or employed and defendant has not raised any enumeration of error or valid ground for appeal prior to the rendition of this opinion.

Decided March 15, 1982. Jeff C. Wayne, District Attorney, for appellee.

In compliance with the above cases, we have fully and carefully examined the record and transcript and find no reversible error. A rational trier of fact (the jury in the case sub judice) could reasonably have found from the evidence adduced at trial proof of the guilt of the defendant beyond a reasonable doubt of each of the seven counts of forgery in the second degree. See Snell v. State, 246 Ga. 648 (272 SE2d 348); Mason v. State, 154 Ga. App. 447 (268 SE2d 688); Mullis v. State, 248 Ga. 338 (1) (282 SE2d 334).

Judgment affirmed.

Banke and Birdsong, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Mullis v. State
282 S.E.2d 334 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1981)
Snell v. State
272 S.E.2d 348 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1980)
Hill v. State
233 S.E.2d 796 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1977)
Bethay v. State
229 S.E.2d 406 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1976)
Mason v. State
268 S.E.2d 688 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
290 S.E.2d 104, 161 Ga. App. 652, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 3064, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lewallen-v-state-gactapp-1982.