Virgil v. State
This text of 302 S.E.2d 109 (Virgil v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant was convicted in the Thomas County Superior Court of the murders of Ceola Virgil, his wife, and Steve Minatee, his [881]*881stepson, and of the possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. Virgil’s court-appointed counsel filed an appeal in this Court but has since filed a motion requesting permission to withdraw from the case.
We find that Virgil’s counsel has met all of the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738 (87 SC 1396, 18 LE2d 493) (1967), and we have carefully reviewed the record and transcript and conclude that the appeal is frivolous. There is ample evidence to support the conviction, and we find that no reversible error was committed. Accordingly, counsel is granted permission to withdraw, and the appeal is dismissed. Anders v. California, supra; Hill v. State, 238 Ga. 564 (233 SE2d 796) (1977).
Motion granted; appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
302 S.E.2d 109, 250 Ga. 880, 1983 Ga. LEXIS 1042, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/virgil-v-state-ga-1983.