Herrly v. Muzik

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Herrly v. Muzik

362 N.W.2d 335, 1985 Minn. LEXIS 1115

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedFebruary 15, 1985

DocketNo. C1-84-307

StatusPublished

This text of 362 N.W.2d 335 (Herrly v. Muzik) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Herrly v. Muzik, 362 N.W.2d 335, 1985 Minn. LEXIS 1115 (Mich. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Prior report: 355 N.W.2d 452.

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Floyd A. Eastlund and Edghar J. Paine for further review of the decision of the Court of Appeals be, and the same is, granted. Briefs shall be filed in the quantity, form and within the time limitations contained in Minn.R.Civ.App. P. 131 and 132. Counsel will be notified at a later date of the time for argument before this court. No requests for extensions of time for the filing of briefs will be entertained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Prior report: 355 N.W.2d 452.

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Floyd A. Eastlund and Edghar J. Paine for further review of the decision of the Court of Appeals be, and the same is, granted. Briefs shall be filed in the quantity, form and within the time limitations contained in Minn.R.Civ.App. P. 131 and 132. Counsel will be notified at a later date of the time for argument before this court. No requests for extensions of time for the filing of briefs will be entertained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

362 N.W.2d 335, 1985 Minn. LEXIS 1115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herrly-v-muzik-minn-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack