Herrera v. State
90 So. 3d 864, 2012 WL 1970284, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 8786
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Herrera v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 18048 →
Opinion
Affirmed. See Barrios-Cruz v. State, 63 So.3d 868 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011). As in Barrios-Cruz, we hold that Padilla v. Kentucky, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), does not apply retroactively in postconviction proceedings, and we certify to the Florida Supreme Court the following question of great public importance pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.030(a)(2)(A)(v):
SHOULD THE RULING IN Padilla v. Kentucky, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), BE APPLIED RETROACTIVELY IN POSTCONVICTION PROCEEDINGS?
Affirmed; question certified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Herrera v. State, 90 So. 3d 864, 2012 WL 1970284, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 8786 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).
90 So. 3d 864 (Herrera v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Padilla v. Kentucky
559 U.S. 356 (Supreme Court, 2010)
Barrios-Cruz v. State
63 So. 3d 868 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)