Herrera v. State

128 So. 3d 49, 2012 WL 5933063, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20350
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Herrera v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 18048
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 28, 2012·No. No. 3D12-2698·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of an order summarily denying a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. On appeal from a summary denial, this Court must reverse unless the postconviction record, see Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(A), shows conclusively that the appellant is entitled to no relief. See Fla. RApp. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D).

Because the record now before us fails to make the required showing, we reverse the order and remand for an evidentiary hearing or other appropriate relief. If the trial court again enters an order summarily denying the postconviction motion, the court shall attach record excerpts conclusively showing that the appellant is not entitled to any relief.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Herrera v. State, 128 So. 3d 49, 2012 WL 5933063, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20350 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

128 So. 3d 49 (Herrera v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.