Herrera v. State

141 So. 3d 713, 2014 WL 2957399, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 10116
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 2, 2014
DocketNo. 4D13-4723
StatusPublished

This text of 141 So. 3d 713 (Herrera v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Herrera v. State, 141 So. 3d 713, 2014 WL 2957399, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 10116 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

[714]*714 On Concession of Error

PER CURIAM.

The State concedes that appellant’s amended postconviction motion, which she filed following our decision in Herrera v. State, 126 So.3d 445 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013), should not have been denied as untimely. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

STEVENSON, CIKLIN and CONNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Herrera v. State
126 So. 3d 445 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
141 So. 3d 713, 2014 WL 2957399, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 10116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herrera-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.